H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Llodra vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Michael Llodra holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2014 Marseille round of 32 6-3 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Llodra #126 6-3 7-6(2) Lukas Lacko #101 Match data Feb 20, 2014* R32 Marseille ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,902 183 216 45.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Llodra Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,597 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,601 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,619 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,732 0 1 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,641 0 1 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2008 22–20 52.4% #40 1,731 0 3 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,741 0 3 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,881 0 5 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,844 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,808 0 5 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Llodra Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2003 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2004 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2007 7 11 18 38.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2009 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 133 242 45.0% 20 37 57 35.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 10 16 26 38.5% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 381/399 of Michael Llodra's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Llodra Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2000 11/12 7.0 5.4 55.8% 74.2% 49.8% 51.0% 43.0% 63.8% 37.2% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2001 12/17 6.9 6.0 58.9% 69.2% 48.7% 51.2% 42.0% 60.8% 35.4% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2002 21/29 7.1 4.8 60.1% 75.3% 45.0% 49.2% 42.4% 63.4% 37.0% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2003 12/12 8.6 5.0 60.6% 68.2% 46.2% 60.6% 28.3% 59.2% 32.1% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2004 32/32 6.2 2.3 65.1% 75.9% 54.2% 69.7% 41.2% 68.4% 38.7% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2005 30/30 5.8 2.4 64.8% 70.1% 50.5% 58.0% 42.5% 63.1% 31.6% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2006 12/12 7.8 1.9 62.3% 70.8% 47.5% 44.9% 33.4% 62.4% 36.9% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2007 31/31 7.4 3.4 62.9% 72.6% 53.4% 65.0% 37.6% 65.4% 35.3% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2008 40/42 9.3 3.4 60.4% 73.5% 54.2% 66.1% 37.6% 65.9% 33.1% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2009 33/33 9.1 2.6 63.3% 77.3% 53.3% 63.8% 41.8% 68.4% 34.3% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2010 48/48 9.1 3.1 62.4% 76.1% 51.5% 63.3% 50.3% 66.9% 34.2% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2011 38/38 7.2 3.3 62.4% 73.7% 51.0% 64.3% 30.8% 65.2% 32.7% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2012 26/26 8.4 2.4 63.5% 73.4% 52.5% 59.8% 32.6% 65.6% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 25/27 7.6 3.3 61.3% 75.3% 53.0% 53.8% 43.7% 66.3% 35.8% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2014 10/10 6.4 1.8 68.9% 70.3% 49.8% 53.7% 30.0% 64.0% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 381/399 7.8 3.2 62.4% 73.8% 51.5% 60.7% 39.6% 65.4% 34.5% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Llodra Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2000 1598 127.1 +0.78 +0.37 1.028 50.1% -44 — +71 38.7% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.08 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2001 1601 121.3 -0.66 -1.24 0.903 48.1% -29 -103 +64 41.5% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.02 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2002 1619 130.3 +1.08 -0.25 1.013 50.6% -10 -111 +6 44.4% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.43 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2003 1590 113.0 -0.96 -3.38 0.786 45.9% -53 — — 33.3% -1.30 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2004 1733 139.9 +4.02 +2.13 1.223 53.3% -62 -149 +32 63.0% +1.00 1–3 (25%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.92 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2005 1625 132.1 +0.29 -3.47 0.857 47.8% +4 -99 +170 35.1% -0.60 7–5 (58%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.74 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2006 1609 120.1 +0.77 -0.43 0.981 49.5% -12 -86 — 35.7% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.12 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2007 1641 132.2 +1.45 -1.19 1.018 50.2% -30 -51 +115 44.7% -0.28 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.22 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2008 1731 142.8 +2.39 -1.86 0.973 49.3% -31 -60 +34 55.0% +0.08 5–6 (45%) 23–15 (61%) — -1.31 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2009 1741 139.4 +3.47 -1.08 1.087 51.3% +1 — +41 48.6% -0.10 5–2 (71%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.08 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2010 1881 147.2 +3.24 -1.57 1.032 50.8% -56 -189 +40 58.3% +0.38 3–5 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.02 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2011 1777 149.5 +1.94 -2.27 0.938 49.2% -37 -84 +194 47.8% -0.17 5–4 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.28 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2012 1844 157.9 +2.15 -1.12 0.948 48.9% +43 -156 — 46.3% -0.30 3–2 (60%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.17 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1809 148.4 +2.33 -0.44 1.061 50.8% +25 — +52 52.5% +0.05 0–6 (0%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.76 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2014 1699 117.2 -0.35 -1.74 0.922 48.9% +10 +3 — 42.9% -0.33 — 2–3 (40%) — +0.81 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 146.8 +1.98 -1.22 0.996 50.0% -20 -99 +73 48.2% -0.09 42–57 (42%) 100–102 (50%) 99.1 -1.25 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.