H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Llodra vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0
Michael Llodra holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2014 Marseille third round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2014* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 6-3 7-6(2) | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Llodra | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |