H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Llodra vs Rik De Voest H2H: 1-0

Michael Llodra holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2009 Marseille round of 32 7-6(2) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rik De Voest
RSA Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Llodra #50 7-6(2) 6-1 Rik De Voest #171 Match data Feb 19, 2009* R32 Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Michael Llodra #79 6-4 6-3 Rik De Voest #131 Match data Mar 6, 2007* Q2 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,902 183 216 45.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Rik De Voest #1,088 #110 538 1,692 19 38 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Llodra Rik De Voest
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0 2003 2–2 50.0% #241 1,468 0 0
24 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,732 0 1 2004 3–2 60.0% #207 1,508 0 0
25 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1 2006 2–7 22.2% #135 1,451 0 0
27 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,641 0 1 2007 3–4 42.9% #120 1,580 0 0
28 2008 22–20 52.4% #40 1,731 0 3 2008 3–7 30.0% #159 1,651 0 0
29 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,741 0 3 2009 1–5 16.7% #236 1,575 0 0
30 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,881 0 5 2010 0–3 0.0% #181 1,630 0 0
31 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5 2011 5–4 55.6% #126 1,665 0 0
32 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,844 0 5 2012 0–3 0.0% #258 1,604 0 0
33 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,808 0 5 2013 0–1 0.0% #171 1,584 0 0
34 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Llodra Rik De Voest
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2003 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2004 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2007 7 11 18 38.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2009 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2012 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 133 242 45.0% 20 37 57 35.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 10 16 26 38.5% — 16 30 46 34.8% — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 381/399 of Michael Llodra's and 57/57 of Rik De Voest's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Llodra Rik De Voest
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2000 11/12 7.0 5.4 55.8% 74.2% 49.8% 51.0% 43.0% 63.8% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 12/17 6.9 6.0 58.9% 69.2% 48.7% 51.2% 42.0% 60.8% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 21/29 7.1 4.8 60.1% 75.3% 45.0% 49.2% 42.4% 63.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2003 12/12 8.6 5.0 60.6% 68.2% 46.2% 60.6% 28.3% 59.2% 32.1% 2003 4/4 1.3 1.5 62.9% 73.6% 51.7% 55.0% 23.6% 64.6% 33.9%
24 2004 32/32 6.2 2.3 65.1% 75.9% 54.2% 69.7% 41.2% 68.4% 38.7% 2004 5/5 5.8 3.0 55.9% 68.2% 55.4% 63.4% 44.7% 62.5% 35.6%
25 2005 30/30 5.8 2.4 64.8% 70.1% 50.5% 58.0% 42.5% 63.1% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 12/12 7.8 1.9 62.3% 70.8% 47.5% 44.9% 33.4% 62.4% 36.9% 2006 9/9 3.6 2.1 58.0% 67.0% 48.0% 61.8% 30.9% 59.1% 32.4%
27 2007 31/31 7.4 3.4 62.9% 72.6% 53.4% 65.0% 37.6% 65.4% 35.3% 2007 7/7 3.6 1.7 60.9% 72.4% 46.1% 57.3% 31.4% 61.7% 38.4%
28 2008 40/42 9.3 3.4 60.4% 73.5% 54.2% 66.1% 37.6% 65.9% 33.1% 2008 10/10 4.1 2.3 57.6% 68.1% 50.8% 51.5% 52.8% 60.5% 33.0%
29 2009 33/33 9.1 2.6 63.3% 77.3% 53.3% 63.8% 41.8% 68.4% 34.3% 2009 6/6 2.8 2.2 58.1% 68.1% 47.5% 57.5% 35.2% 58.5% 31.6%
30 2010 48/48 9.1 3.1 62.4% 76.1% 51.5% 63.3% 50.3% 66.9% 34.2% 2010 3/3 7.3 2.3 65.9% 66.2% 47.8% 50.1% 38.7% 59.8% 34.6%
31 2011 38/38 7.2 3.3 62.4% 73.7% 51.0% 64.3% 30.8% 65.2% 32.7% 2011 9/9 4.1 1.2 61.1% 69.8% 47.8% 64.8% 37.8% 61.1% 35.3%
32 2012 26/26 8.4 2.4 63.5% 73.4% 52.5% 59.8% 32.6% 65.6% 32.6% 2012 3/3 5.0 0.0 66.2% 65.9% 45.3% 53.3% 30.2% 59.3% 32.6%
33 2013 25/27 7.6 3.3 61.3% 75.3% 53.0% 53.8% 43.7% 66.3% 35.8% 2013 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.9% 56.9% 47.8% 63.6% 33.3% 54.1% 33.3%
34 2014 10/10 6.4 1.8 68.9% 70.3% 49.8% 53.7% 30.0% 64.0% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 381/399 7.8 3.2 62.4% 73.8% 51.5% 60.7% 39.6% 65.4% 34.5% — 57/57 4.0 1.9 60.0% 68.7% 48.9% 58.1% 37.5% 60.6% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Llodra Rik De Voest
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2000 1598 127.1 +0.78 +0.37 1.028 50.1% -44 — +71 38.7% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1601 121.3 -0.66 -1.24 0.903 48.1% -29 -103 +64 41.5% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1619 130.3 +1.08 -0.25 1.013 50.6% -10 -111 +6 44.4% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.43 2002 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2003 1590 113.0 -0.96 -3.38 0.786 45.9% -53 — — 33.3% -1.30 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20 2003 1469 105.2 -0.66 +1.23 0.958 48.7% — — — 50.0% +0.13 — 0–1 — +0.08
24 2004 1733 139.9 +4.02 +2.13 1.223 53.3% -62 -149 +32 63.0% +1.00 1–3 (25%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.92 2004 1509 105.1 -0.63 -0.05 0.950 49.7% +36 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.28
25 2005 1625 132.1 +0.29 -3.47 0.857 47.8% +4 -99 +170 35.1% -0.60 7–5 (58%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.74 2005 1504 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 1609 120.1 +0.77 -0.43 0.981 49.5% -12 -86 — 35.7% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.12 2006 1451 112.9 -1.37 -2.43 0.791 46.3% +35 — — 30.0% -1.15 0–2 0–1 — +0.04
27 2007 1641 132.2 +1.45 -1.19 1.018 50.2% -30 -51 +115 44.7% -0.28 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.22 2007 1581 111.0 -1.61 +1.14 1.003 50.2% -3 — — 28.6% -1.43 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.13
28 2008 1731 142.8 +2.39 -1.86 0.973 49.3% -31 -60 +34 55.0% +0.08 5–6 (45%) 23–15 (61%) — -1.31 2008 1651 120.0 -2.23 -1.52 0.834 47.1% +18 — — 30.4% -1.22 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.47
29 2009 1741 139.4 +3.47 -1.08 1.087 51.3% +1 — +41 48.6% -0.10 5–2 (71%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.08 2009 1576 109.5 -3.14 -1.79 0.761 46.0% +30 — — 23.1% -1.23 0–1 0–4 (0%) — +0.41
30 2010 1881 147.2 +3.24 -1.57 1.032 50.8% -56 -189 +40 58.3% +0.38 3–5 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.02 2010 1630 119.7 -1.54 -0.67 0.860 47.5% — — — 33.3% -0.92 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.05
31 2011 1777 149.5 +1.94 -2.27 0.938 49.2% -37 -84 +194 47.8% -0.17 5–4 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.28 2011 1665 118.2 -0.48 -1.65 0.907 49.0% -23 — — 47.6% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.95
32 2012 1844 157.9 +2.15 -1.12 0.948 48.9% +43 -156 — 46.3% -0.30 3–2 (60%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.17 2012 1605 111.1 -0.91 -1.40 0.802 46.5% +28 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–2 0–1 — +0.13
33 2013 1809 148.4 +2.33 -0.44 1.061 50.8% +25 — +52 52.5% +0.05 0–6 (0%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.76 2013 1585 113.2 -2.33 -1.71 0.725 44.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13
34 2014 1699 117.2 -0.35 -1.74 0.922 48.9% +10 +3 — 42.9% -0.33 — 2–3 (40%) — +0.81 2014 1558 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 146.8 +1.98 -1.22 0.996 50.0% -20 -99 +73 48.2% -0.09 42–57 (42%) 100–102 (50%) 99.1 -1.25 — 1692 117.2 -1.48 -1.02 0.865 47.8% +15 — — 35.1% -0.88 4–9 (31%) 8–14 (36%) 91.9 +4.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.