H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Robertson vs Matt Anger H2H: 1-0

Michael Robertson holds a 1–0 lead over Matt Anger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Robertson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Robertson won the 1985 Miami Open round of 128 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Robertson
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Matt Anger
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Robertson #444 7-5 7-6 Matt Anger #183 Match data Feb 5, 1985* R128 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Robertson #598 #101 139 1,590 23 46 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matt Anger #1,115 #23 74 1,818 82 106 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Robertson Matt Anger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1982 0–1 0.0% #826 1,498 0 0 1981 0–3 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1982 4–6 40.0% — 1,516 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1983 5–9 35.7% #289 1,575 0 0
21 1985 5–7 41.7% #168 1,526 0 0 1984 7–6 53.8% #229 1,619 0 0
22 1986 5–10 33.3% #203 1,483 0 0 1985 17–10 63.0% #30 1,796 0 1
23 1987 1–5 16.7% #223 1,453 0 0 1986 20–21 48.8% #59 1,728 0 1
24 1988 6–10 37.5% #181 1,493 0 0 1987 16–22 42.1% #91 1,656 0 1
25 1989 5–9 35.7% #167 1,506 0 0 1988 10–17 37.0% #124 1,600 0 1
26 1990 1–2 33.3% #268 1,509 0 0 1989 3–12 20.0% #351 1,486 0 1
27 1991 0–2 0.0% #311 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Robertson Matt Anger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1986 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 15 11 26 57.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
24 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 9 13 22 40.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
26 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 25 41 39.0% 4 12 16 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — 46 61 107 43.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 26 23 49 53.1% 6 15 21 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Robertson Matt Anger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1982 1498 108.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.23 1981 1477 105.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.02
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1517 116.0 — — — — — +34 — 36.4% -1.00 2–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1576 109.5 — — — — -46 — -3 37.8% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.39
21 1985 1526 110.3 — — — — +24 — +64 39.3% -0.72 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.92 1984 1619 118.0 — — — — -65 — -3 51.5% -0.18 2–1 (67%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.62
22 1986 1484 109.6 — — — — +89 -6 — 39.5% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.32 1985 1796 137.1 — — — — -44 — -99 55.6% +0.43 7–2 (78%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.57
23 1987 1453 101.4 — — — — +80 — — 26.3% -1.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.35 1986 1729 132.2 — — — — -21 — +11 48.1% +0.03 7–4 (64%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.28
24 1988 1493 128.5 — — — — +34 — — 42.1% -0.24 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.48 1987 1656 127.1 — — — — -19 -128 +123 42.1% -0.60 5–4 (56%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.25
25 1989 1506 118.7 — — — — +30 -16 — 37.8% -0.27 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.36 1988 1600 128.0 — — — — -7 — +107 41.4% -0.44 3–7 (30%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.22
26 1990 1510 107.2 — — — — — — — 44.4% +0.44 0–1 0–1 — -0.07 1989 1487 110.7 — — — — +3 — +191 33.3% -0.90 0–4 (0%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.64
27 1991 1495 104.2 -1.95 -0.48 0.651 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — 0–1 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1590 121.5 -1.95 -0.48 0.651 40.2% +44 -9 +64 36.9% -0.64 9–14 (39%) 17–21 (45%) 97.1 +2.97 — 1818 131.8 — — — — -23 -20 +39 44.4% -0.35 28–25 (53%) 44–41 (52%) 104.9 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.