H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Michael Russell vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Michael Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Russell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Russell won the 2014 Memphis third round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2014* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Russell | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,810 | 77 | 149 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michael Russell | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |