H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Stich vs Byron Black H2H: 2-1
Michael Stich holds a 2–1 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Michael Stich leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1995 US Open fourth round 6-4 6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Byron Black | 6-4 6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3 | Michael Stich | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Michael Stich | 7-6(5) 6-2 6-1 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1994* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Michael Stich | 6-2 6-3 | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | #116 | #2 | 3,445 | 2,119 | 350 | 162 | 68.4% | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Stich | Byron Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #42 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 1 | 5 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 67–19 | 77.9% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 1,925 | 1 | 16 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,895 | 1 | 17 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,828 | 1 | 18 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,842 | 1 | 18 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |