H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Michal Przysiezny vs Filip Veger.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Przysiezny | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | Filip Veger | Match data | Sep 15, 2014 | Q2 | Metz | ATP 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,346 | #57 | 810 | 1,783 | 19 | 59 | 24.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Filip Veger | #1,701 | #478 | 76 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michal Przysiezny | Filip Veger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #174 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Michal Przysiezny | Filip Veger | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1482 | 94.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1468 | 93.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1465 | 98.0 | -1.87 | -2.11 | 0.574 | 42.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1482 | 106.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1478 | 104.1 | -0.13 | -2.62 | 0.778 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.03 | 2015 | 1467 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 1507 | 110.8 | +0.85 | -1.37 | 0.993 | 50.1% | — | +39 | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 1541 | 111.9 | -0.66 | -0.96 | 0.841 | 47.0% | — | +24 | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 1514 | 102.9 | -0.59 | -3.68 | 0.644 | 43.1% | — | +58 | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 1517 | 108.0 | +0.26 | -4.12 | 0.808 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 1431 | 114.5 | -2.53 | -4.94 | 0.699 | 45.0% | +3 | +75 | +146 | 24.2% | -1.30 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–7 (13%) | 91.5 | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 1440 | 111.8 | -1.03 | -2.02 | 0.965 | 50.0% | +12 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.61 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 1489 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 1776 | 134.8 | +1.94 | -2.48 | 0.909 | 49.2% | -91 | — | -65 | 43.6% | -0.42 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–6 (45%) | 105.3 | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 1660 | 121.7 | -1.71 | -4.21 | 0.811 | 46.8% | +17 | -131 | -26 | 31.0% | -1.26 | 3–6 (33%) | 8–7 (53%) | 97.5 | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1668 | 119.8 | -0.92 | -3.23 | 0.723 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 1656 | 105.5 | -4.72 | -0.33 | 0.748 | 46.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 1633 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1783 | 122.9 | -0.54 | -3.28 | 0.825 | 47.3% | -24 | +10 | +3 | 31.8% | -1.04 | 9–18 (33%) | 16–24 (40%) | 93.1 | +0.24 | — | 1516 | 97.9 | -1.87 | -2.11 | 0.574 | 42.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -3.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 28, 2014 | H2H |
| Albert Montanes | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 21, 2014 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 26, 2014 | H2H |
| Horacio Zeballos | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 15, 2014 | H2H |
| Julien Benneteau | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 7, 2013 | H2H |