H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Michal Przysiezny vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 1-0
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2014 Kuala Lumpur third round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2014* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2010 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 6-3 6-4 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malek Jaziri | #1,645 | #42 | 1,042 | 1,843 | 83 | 134 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michal Przysiezny | Malek Jaziri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #98 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #45 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #201 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #312 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #433 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1645 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |