H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mike Cahill vs John Newcombe H2H: 1-1
Mike Cahill and John Newcombe are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike Cahill leads 1–0 on clay, while John Newcombe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mike Cahill won the 1978 Manila third round 6-3 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 82
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1978* | Manila | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mike Cahill | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | John Newcombe | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1975* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Newcombe | 6-4 6-3 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Newcombe | #826 | #1 | 0 | 2,201 | 556 | 224 | 71.3% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Cahill | John Newcombe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 70–37 | 65.4% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 1,887 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 65–23 | 73.9% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,082 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,129 | 2 | 27 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,052 | 4 | 31 |
| 30 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 87–16 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,115 | 4 | 40 |
| 31 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #20 | 2,004 | 5 | 41 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #21 | 1,827 | 5 | 41 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #119 | 1,833 | 5 | 41 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,815 | 5 | 41 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #226 | 1,831 | 5 | 41 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,799 | 5 | 41 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,792 | 5 | 41 |