H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mike Estep vs John Newcombe H2H: 0-3
John Newcombe holds a 3–0 lead over Mike Estep in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, John Newcombe leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Newcombe won the 1976 Maui fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 82
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1976* | Maui | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Newcombe | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Mike Estep | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1974* | Manila | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Newcombe | 6-1 6-2 | Mike Estep | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1974* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Newcombe | 6-1 7-6 | Mike Estep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Estep | #409 | #59 | 0 | 1,760 | 120 | 184 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| John Newcombe | #826 | #1 | 0 | 2,201 | 556 | 224 | 71.3% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Estep | John Newcombe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 70–37 | 65.4% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1975 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 1,887 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1976 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #81 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 65–23 | 73.9% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 1977 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #212 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,082 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,129 | 2 | 27 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,052 | 4 | 31 |
| 30 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 87–16 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,115 | 4 | 40 |
| 31 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #20 | 2,004 | 5 | 41 |
| 32 | 1982 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #93 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #21 | 1,827 | 5 | 41 |
| 33 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #119 | 1,833 | 5 | 41 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,815 | 5 | 41 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #226 | 1,831 | 5 | 41 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,799 | 5 | 41 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,792 | 5 | 41 |