H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mike Leach vs John Alexander H2H: 1-1
Mike Leach and John Alexander are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike Leach leads 1–0 on carpet, while John Alexander leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mike Leach won the 1984 Melbourne Indoor fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 75
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1984* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mike Leach | 6-3 6-3 | John Alexander | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1982* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | John Alexander | 6-3 5-7 5-5 (ret.) | Mike Leach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Leach | #999 | #29 | 0 | 1,784 | 73 | 102 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Alexander | #860 | #8 | 0 | 2,067 | 579 | 422 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mike Leach | John Alexander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 44–36 | 55.0% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 36–32 | 52.9% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #372 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #26 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 67–24 | 73.6% | #8 | 1,957 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #47 | 1,851 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 48–33 | 59.3% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #115 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 50–31 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1987 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #241 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #20 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #100 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #75 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #31 | 1,791 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #77 | 1,656 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,564 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,491 | 0 | 9 |