H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Mikhail Kukushkin vs Ilya Ivashka H2H: 0-1
Ilya Ivashka holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Kukushkin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ilya Ivashka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ilya Ivashka won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics third round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Belarus
Age 32
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Ilya Ivashka | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #317 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 145 | 220 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ilya Ivashka | #406 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,954 | 80 | 84 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Kukushkin | Ilya Ivashka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #107 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #48 | 1,933 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |