H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mikhail Kukushkin vs Mikhail Elgin H2H: 0-1
Mikhail Elgin holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Kukushkin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikhail Elgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Elgin won the 2009 St. Petersburg third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2009* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Elgin | 6-3 6-3 | Mikhail Kukushkin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mikhail Elgin | #1,662 | #123 | 607 | 1,562 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mikhail Kukushkin | Mikhail Elgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #747 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #367 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #679 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #959 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |