H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Albert Montanes H2H: 2-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2011 Roland Garros third round 6-1 7-6(0) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Albert Montanes #38 6-1 7-6(0) 6-1 Mikhail Youzhny #13 Match data
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #38 6-1 6-3 6-2 Albert Montanes #83 Match data
Jan 10, 2002* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #60 4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 Albert Montanes #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6