H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 2–1 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2010 Munich third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2010* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #15 6-1 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #43 Match data
Jul 31, 2009* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Jeremy Chardy #33 6-3 5-7 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #70 Match data
Mar 27, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #62 6-4 3-6 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1