H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Mikhail Youzhny vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 5-2

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–2 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 3–2 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 Canada Masters second round 6-4 7-6(3).

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 2013* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #25 6-4 7-6(3) Jurgen Melzer #33 Match data
Feb 27, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 SF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #15 7-5 7-6(4) Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data
May 22, 2009* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #46 6-4 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #26 Match data
May 5, 2007* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #17 6-2 7-6(5) Jurgen Melzer #30 Match data
Jul 29, 2006* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #50 6-3 3-6 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #81 Match data
May 4, 2006* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #70 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #40 Match data
May 27, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jurgen Melzer #44 6-3 6-4 7-6(5) Mikhail Youzhny #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mikhail Youzhny Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5