H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mikhail Youzhny vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-3
Milos Raonic holds a 3–1 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2017 Wimbledon second round 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Milos Raonic | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 7-5 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2016* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 2-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2013* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mikhail Youzhny | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |