H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 3-1
Milos Raonic holds a 3–1 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2015 Australian Open third round 6-4 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2014* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-4 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2012* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Benjamin Becker | 6-3 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2012* | Memphis | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-4 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Benjamin Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |