H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Denis Istomin H2H: 5-0
Milos Raonic holds a 5–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2020 Delray Beach third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2020* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-2 6-2 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| May 26, 2017* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-3 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2014* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2013* | San Jose | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(0) 6-3 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2012* | San Jose | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |