H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Denis Kudla H2H: 1-0
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Kudla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2016 Miami Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2016* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Denis Kudla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Denis Kudla | #1,269 | #53 | 858 | 1,836 | 71 | 131 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Denis Kudla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #496 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #276 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #69 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #131 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #63 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #114 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #105 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #267 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |