H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Milos Raonic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 4-3

Milos Raonic holds a 4–3 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Fernando Verdasco leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2015 US Open second round 6-2 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Milos Raonic #10 6-2 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(1) Fernando Verdasco #42 Match data
Oct 10, 2013* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Milos Raonic #11 7-6(1) 3-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #32 Match data
May 8, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #46 6-4 2-6 7-6(7) Milos Raonic #14 Match data
May 10, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #17 6-4 6-4 Milos Raonic #26 Match data
Apr 30, 2011* Estoril ATP 250 SF Clay Fernando Verdasco #15 6-4 (ret.) Milos Raonic #27 Match data
Feb 17, 2011* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Milos Raonic #59 6-4 3-6 7-6(5) Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Feb 13, 2011* San Jose ATP 250 F Hard Milos Raonic #84 7-6(6) 7-6(5) Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Milos Raonic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7