H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Milos Raonic vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-0

Milos Raonic holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2017 Roland Garros third round 6-1 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Milos Raonic #6 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #153 Match data Jun 3, 2017* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Milos Raonic #12 6-1 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #55 Match data Mar 24, 2014* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,248 370 188 66.3% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Milos Raonic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,834 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2012 43–21 67.2% #13 1,980 0 3 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,036 0 5 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,088 0 6 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,048 0 7 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,162 0 8 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,078 0 8 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,975 0 8 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,934 0 8 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 2,016 0 8 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,978 0 8 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,918 0 8 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 2024 6–6 50.0% #238 1,897 0 8 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Milos Raonic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 20 10 30 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 31 12 43 72.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 33 13 46 71.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2014 31 13 44 70.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2015 24 11 35 68.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2016 32 13 45 71.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2017 14 7 21 66.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2018 18 13 31 58.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2019 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2020 22 9 31 71.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2021 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2024 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 254 125 379 67.0% 62 36 98 63.3% 54 27 81 66.7% — — — — — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/558 of Milos Raonic's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Milos Raonic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 1/1 20.0 3.0 58.2% 85.9% 45.7% 85.7% 20.0% 69.1% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 7/7 14.0 3.7 59.6% 79.1% 45.1% 63.7% 22.7% 65.7% 28.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 47/48 13.6 2.2 63.9% 78.9% 54.7% 66.3% 42.8% 70.1% 33.8% 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 2012 60/64 16.2 3.3 61.3% 82.6% 57.2% 70.4% 46.2% 73.2% 34.7% 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 2013 60/62 14.7 3.0 62.9% 82.8% 54.1% 66.2% 39.3% 72.2% 33.6% 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 2014 67/67 16.5 3.1 61.4% 82.6% 55.3% 66.1% 43.1% 72.0% 33.9% 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 2015 47/47 15.8 3.0 63.0% 81.5% 58.3% 75.5% 32.7% 73.0% 31.0% 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2016 69/71 12.7 3.3 63.9% 80.9% 56.9% 69.0% 40.5% 72.2% 36.6% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2017 40/43 14.2 3.5 63.3% 80.4% 57.1% 65.3% 42.0% 71.8% 35.6% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 2018 45/49 17.5 4.0 63.2% 83.4% 58.0% 57.4% 35.7% 74.2% 34.0% 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 2019 34/36 19.7 3.7 62.9% 84.7% 57.2% 63.3% 35.8% 74.5% 34.7% 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 2020 32/33 16.5 3.4 63.0% 84.0% 56.9% 78.8% 40.7% 74.0% 36.0% 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 2021 10/10 16.6 5.1 60.3% 80.5% 57.8% 64.1% 42.8% 71.4% 37.4% 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 2023 8/8 17.8 6.1 60.8% 82.6% 46.8% 70.2% 37.0% 68.5% 29.8% 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 2024 10/12 16.7 3.2 62.3% 83.2% 57.4% 52.9% 23.8% 73.2% 32.5% 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Milos Raonic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2008 1488 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1535 118.1 +0.53 +4.04 1.069 51.1% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1652 123.4 +0.54 -3.37 0.816 47.5% +23 — — 42.1% -0.74 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1835 152.5 +5.93 -1.86 1.129 51.6% +62 -201 -204 61.2% +0.49 10–7 (59%) 22–12 (65%) 106.1 +0.34 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27
21 2012 1980 165.4 +9.03 -1.07 1.292 53.5% +43 -208 -253 65.4% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 27–22 (55%) 103.6 +1.28 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99
22 2013 2037 163.9 +7.91 -1.26 1.212 52.2% +56 -201 -372 62.5% +0.72 9–5 (64%) 19–17 (53%) 102.0 +1.75 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2014 2089 170.2 +7.97 -0.86 1.213 52.8% +12 -85 -241 66.9% +0.85 11–7 (61%) 38–13 (75%) 110.3 +3.89 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2015 2048 167.3 +7.76 -2.58 1.147 52.1% +48 -7 -157 62.1% +0.81 12–4 (75%) 22–19 (54%) 103.8 +1.09 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2016 2163 173.6 +8.50 +1.49 1.313 53.6% -7 -113 -8 69.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 27–14 (66%) 109.4 -1.03 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2017 2079 162.7 +6.78 +0.23 1.261 53.2% +49 -42 +25 66.7% +0.92 4–1 (80%) 16–11 (59%) 103.2 -0.68 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 2018 1975 153.8 +8.35 -0.88 1.318 53.1% +7 +61 +177 64.0% +0.70 5–5 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 100.1 +1.79 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 2019 1934 154.2 +7.20 -0.04 1.360 53.8% +1 — +195 67.8% +0.93 3–6 (33%) 19–9 (68%) 98.3 +1.72 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 2020 2017 164.6 +7.82 +0.28 1.382 54.3% +17 — — 72.2% +1.32 2–5 (29%) 13–8 (62%) 96.3 +0.12 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 2021 1979 139.0 +4.52 +0.69 1.309 53.5% +19 — — 62.1% +0.96 0–2 2–4 (33%) — +0.31 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 2023 1919 127.9 +2.47 -1.58 0.944 49.3% +65 — +186 45.5% -0.23 1–0 3–4 (43%) — -0.07 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 2024 1898 124.3 +5.72 -1.03 1.214 51.5% +70 — +199 61.9% +0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 -0.82 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2248 169.1 +7.54 -0.67 1.241 52.8% +29 -114 -17 64.8% +0.80 81–60 (57%) 232–150 (61%) 107.6 +1.81 — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.