H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 2-2
Milos Raonic and Ivan Dodig are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2016 Brisbane fourth round 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2013* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2013* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Ivan Dodig | 6-2 7-6(7) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2011* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Ivan Dodig | 7-6(0) 4-6 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |