H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs James Blake H2H: 2-0
Milos Raonic holds a 2–0 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2012 US Open third round 6-3 6-0 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-0 7-6(3) | James Blake | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2011* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-2 7-6(4) | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | James Blake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 |