H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 19:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Kevin Anderson H2H: 1-1
Milos Raonic and Kevin Anderson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kevin Anderson leads 1–0 on clay, while Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Anderson won the 2013 Roland Garros third round 7-5 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 40
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Kevin Anderson | 7-5 7-6(4) 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2012* | San Jose | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-5 7-6(3) | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Kevin Anderson | #1,151 | #5 | 4,845 | 2,142 | 347 | 251 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Kevin Anderson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #61 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #32 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #37 | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,958 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #12 | 2,046 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #67 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 2,123 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #91 | 2,057 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #81 | 1,964 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #104 | 1,681 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #627 | 1,669 | 0 | 7 |