H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Milos Raonic vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 1-1

Milos Raonic and Lleyton Hewitt are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2014 Washington Open third round 7-6(1) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Milos Raonic #7 7-6(1) 7-6(3) Lleyton Hewitt #45 Match data Aug 1, 2014* R16 Washington Open ATP 500 Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #181 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) 6-3 Milos Raonic #25 Match data Jan 22, 2012* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,248 370 188 66.3% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Milos Raonic Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2
19 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6
20 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,834 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2012 43–21 67.2% #13 1,980 0 3 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17
22 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,036 0 5 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,088 0 6 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23
24 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,048 0 7 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24
25 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,162 0 8 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25
26 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,078 0 8 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26
27 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,975 0 8 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,934 0 8 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27
29 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 2,016 0 8 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28
30 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,978 0 8 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28
31 — — — — — — — 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28
32 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,918 0 8 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28
33 2024 6–6 50.0% #238 1,897 0 8 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Milos Raonic Lleyton Hewitt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 2011 20 10 30 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2012 31 12 43 72.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2013 33 13 46 71.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2014 31 13 44 70.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2015 24 11 35 68.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2016 32 13 45 71.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
26 2017 14 7 21 66.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2018 18 13 31 58.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2019 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2020 22 9 31 71.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
30 2021 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
32 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
33 2024 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 254 125 379 67.0% 62 36 98 63.3% 54 27 81 66.7% — — — — — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/558 of Milos Raonic's and 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Milos Raonic Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6%
18 2009 1/1 20.0 3.0 58.2% 85.9% 45.7% 85.7% 20.0% 69.1% 33.0% 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8%
19 2010 7/7 14.0 3.7 59.6% 79.1% 45.1% 63.7% 22.7% 65.7% 28.0% 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8%
20 2011 47/48 13.6 2.2 63.9% 78.9% 54.7% 66.3% 42.8% 70.1% 33.8% 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2%
21 2012 60/64 16.2 3.3 61.3% 82.6% 57.2% 70.4% 46.2% 73.2% 34.7% 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4%
22 2013 60/62 14.7 3.0 62.9% 82.8% 54.1% 66.2% 39.3% 72.2% 33.6% 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4%
23 2014 67/67 16.5 3.1 61.4% 82.6% 55.3% 66.1% 43.1% 72.0% 33.9% 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7%
24 2015 47/47 15.8 3.0 63.0% 81.5% 58.3% 75.5% 32.7% 73.0% 31.0% 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3%
25 2016 69/71 12.7 3.3 63.9% 80.9% 56.9% 69.0% 40.5% 72.2% 36.6% 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0%
26 2017 40/43 14.2 3.5 63.3% 80.4% 57.1% 65.3% 42.0% 71.8% 35.6% 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3%
27 2018 45/49 17.5 4.0 63.2% 83.4% 58.0% 57.4% 35.7% 74.2% 34.0% 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0%
28 2019 34/36 19.7 3.7 62.9% 84.7% 57.2% 63.3% 35.8% 74.5% 34.7% 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5%
29 2020 32/33 16.5 3.4 63.0% 84.0% 56.9% 78.8% 40.7% 74.0% 36.0% 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0%
30 2021 10/10 16.6 5.1 60.3% 80.5% 57.8% 64.1% 42.8% 71.4% 37.4% 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7%
32 2023 8/8 17.8 6.1 60.8% 82.6% 46.8% 70.2% 37.0% 68.5% 29.8% 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0%
33 2024 10/12 16.7 3.2 62.3% 83.2% 57.4% 52.9% 23.8% 73.2% 32.5% 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4%
Career — 537/558 15.6 3.3 62.7% 82.0% 56.2% 67.4% 39.7% 72.4% 34.3% — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Milos Raonic Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13
17 2008 1488 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 103.2 -0.28
18 2009 1535 118.1 +0.53 +4.04 1.069 51.1% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) 104.4 -2.41
19 2010 1652 123.4 +0.54 -3.37 0.816 47.5% +23 — — 42.1% -0.74 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.22 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) 102.4 -2.06
20 2011 1835 152.5 +5.93 -1.86 1.129 51.6% +62 -201 -204 61.2% +0.49 10–7 (59%) 22–12 (65%) 106.1 +0.34 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) 104.9 +1.18
21 2012 1980 165.4 +9.03 -1.07 1.292 53.5% +43 -208 -253 65.4% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 27–22 (55%) 103.6 +1.28 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) 108.8 -1.87
22 2013 2037 163.9 +7.91 -1.26 1.212 52.2% +56 -201 -372 62.5% +0.72 9–5 (64%) 19–17 (53%) 102.0 +1.75 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 92.8 +1.40
23 2014 2089 170.2 +7.97 -0.86 1.213 52.8% +12 -85 -241 66.9% +0.85 11–7 (61%) 38–13 (75%) 110.3 +3.89 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 103.8 -2.32
24 2015 2048 167.3 +7.76 -2.58 1.147 52.1% +48 -7 -157 62.1% +0.81 12–4 (75%) 22–19 (54%) 103.8 +1.09 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) 107.6 -1.18
25 2016 2163 173.6 +8.50 +1.49 1.313 53.6% -7 -113 -8 69.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 27–14 (66%) 109.4 -1.03 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 +0.55
26 2017 2079 162.7 +6.78 +0.23 1.261 53.2% +49 -42 +25 66.7% +0.92 4–1 (80%) 16–11 (59%) 103.2 -0.68 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 94.4 +1.23
27 2018 1975 153.8 +8.35 -0.88 1.318 53.1% +7 +61 +177 64.0% +0.70 5–5 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 100.1 +1.79 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) 92.4 -1.01
28 2019 1934 154.2 +7.20 -0.04 1.360 53.8% +1 — +195 67.8% +0.93 3–6 (33%) 19–9 (68%) 98.3 +1.72 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 97.5 -1.75
29 2020 2017 164.6 +7.82 +0.28 1.382 54.3% +17 — — 72.2% +1.32 2–5 (29%) 13–8 (62%) 96.3 +0.12 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) 103.7 -0.34
30 2021 1979 139.0 +4.52 +0.69 1.309 53.5% +19 — — 62.1% +0.96 0–2 2–4 (33%) — +0.31 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -0.31
32 2023 1919 127.9 +2.47 -1.58 0.944 49.3% +65 — +186 45.5% -0.23 1–0 3–4 (43%) — -0.07 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 104.4 -1.05
33 2024 1898 124.3 +5.72 -1.03 1.214 51.5% +70 — +199 61.9% +0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 -0.82 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.9 -0.31
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 90.2 +0.96
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04
Career — 2248 169.1 +7.54 -0.67 1.241 52.8% +29 -114 -17 64.8% +0.80 81–60 (57%) 232–150 (61%) 107.6 +1.81 — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.