H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2014 Wimbledon third round 7-6(2) 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Milos Raonic | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Milos Raonic | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |