H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Marcel Granollers H2H: 1-0
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Marcel Granollers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2014 Roland Garros fourth round 6-3 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Marcel Granollers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |