H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Mardy Fish H2H: 2-0
Milos Raonic holds a 2–0 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2011 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2011* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-5 6-4 | Mardy Fish | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2011* | Memphis | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Mardy Fish | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Mardy Fish | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |