H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Ryan Harrison H2H: 1-2
Ryan Harrison holds a 2–1 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ryan Harrison leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ryan Harrison won the 2016 US Open second round 6-7(4) 7-5 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ryan Harrison | 6-7(4) 7-5 7-5 6-1 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2012* | San Jose | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Ryan Harrison | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2011* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ryan Harrison | 7-6(1) 4-6 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Ryan Harrison | #1,551 | #40 | 1,160 | 1,893 | 117 | 155 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Ryan Harrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #748 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #79 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #69 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #100 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #112 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #302 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #479 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |