H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 3-0
Milos Raonic holds a 3–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2015 Rotterdam quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2015* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2012* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2010* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-7(8) 7-6(9) 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Milos Raonic | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |