H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Milos Raonic vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 6-1

Milos Raonic holds a 6–1 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 5–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2017 Japan Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Milos Raonic #12 6-3 6-4 Viktor Troicki #55 Match data Oct 5, 2017* R32 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Milos Raonic #6 6-2 6-3 Viktor Troicki #38 Match data May 6, 2017* SF Istanbul ATP 250 Clay
Milos Raonic #5 6-3 7-5 Viktor Troicki #38 Match data Mar 25, 2017* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Milos Raonic #14 6-2 6-3 6-4 Viktor Troicki #26 Match data Jan 24, 2016* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Viktor Troicki #24 6-4 6-4 Milos Raonic #9 Match data Oct 8, 2015* R32 China Open ATP 500 Hard
Milos Raonic #15 3-0 (ret.) Viktor Troicki #32 Match data Oct 5, 2012* R16 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Milos Raonic #24 6-3 6-4 Viktor Troicki #33 Match data Aug 9, 2012* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,248 370 188 66.3% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Milos Raonic Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,834 0 1 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2012 43–21 67.2% #13 1,980 0 3 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,036 0 5 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0
23 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,088 0 6 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0
24 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,048 0 7 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1
25 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,162 0 8 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,078 0 8 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1
27 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,975 0 8 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1
28 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,934 0 8 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 2,016 0 8 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2
30 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,978 0 8 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,918 0 8 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3
33 2024 6–6 50.0% #238 1,897 0 8 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Milos Raonic Viktor Troicki
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 20 10 30 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 31 12 43 72.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2013 33 13 46 71.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2014 31 13 44 70.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2015 24 11 35 68.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2016 32 13 45 71.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2017 14 7 21 66.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2018 18 13 31 58.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2019 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2020 22 9 31 71.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
30 2021 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2024 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 254 125 379 67.0% 62 36 98 63.3% 54 27 81 66.7% — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 537/558 of Milos Raonic's and 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Milos Raonic Viktor Troicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 1/1 20.0 3.0 58.2% 85.9% 45.7% 85.7% 20.0% 69.1% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 7/7 14.0 3.7 59.6% 79.1% 45.1% 63.7% 22.7% 65.7% 28.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 47/48 13.6 2.2 63.9% 78.9% 54.7% 66.3% 42.8% 70.1% 33.8% 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0%
21 2012 60/64 16.2 3.3 61.3% 82.6% 57.2% 70.4% 46.2% 73.2% 34.7% 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8%
22 2013 60/62 14.7 3.0 62.9% 82.8% 54.1% 66.2% 39.3% 72.2% 33.6% 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2%
23 2014 67/67 16.5 3.1 61.4% 82.6% 55.3% 66.1% 43.1% 72.0% 33.9% 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2015 47/47 15.8 3.0 63.0% 81.5% 58.3% 75.5% 32.7% 73.0% 31.0% 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3%
25 2016 69/71 12.7 3.3 63.9% 80.9% 56.9% 69.0% 40.5% 72.2% 36.6% 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9%
26 2017 40/43 14.2 3.5 63.3% 80.4% 57.1% 65.3% 42.0% 71.8% 35.6% 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5%
27 2018 45/49 17.5 4.0 63.2% 83.4% 58.0% 57.4% 35.7% 74.2% 34.0% 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5%
28 2019 34/36 19.7 3.7 62.9% 84.7% 57.2% 63.3% 35.8% 74.5% 34.7% 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2%
29 2020 32/33 16.5 3.4 63.0% 84.0% 56.9% 78.8% 40.7% 74.0% 36.0% 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2%
30 2021 10/10 16.6 5.1 60.3% 80.5% 57.8% 64.1% 42.8% 71.4% 37.4% 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4%
32 2023 8/8 17.8 6.1 60.8% 82.6% 46.8% 70.2% 37.0% 68.5% 29.8% 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5%
33 2024 10/12 16.7 3.2 62.3% 83.2% 57.4% 52.9% 23.8% 73.2% 32.5% 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2%
Career — 537/558 15.6 3.3 62.7% 82.0% 56.2% 67.4% 39.7% 72.4% 34.3% — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Milos Raonic Viktor Troicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2008 1488 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1535 118.1 +0.53 +4.04 1.069 51.1% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1652 123.4 +0.54 -3.37 0.816 47.5% +23 — — 42.1% -0.74 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1835 152.5 +5.93 -1.86 1.129 51.6% +62 -201 -204 61.2% +0.49 10–7 (59%) 22–12 (65%) — +0.34 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15
21 2012 1980 165.4 +9.03 -1.07 1.292 53.5% +43 -208 -253 65.4% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 27–22 (55%) — +1.28 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12
22 2013 2037 163.9 +7.91 -1.26 1.212 52.2% +56 -201 -372 62.5% +0.72 9–5 (64%) 19–17 (53%) — +1.75 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.41
23 2014 2089 170.2 +7.97 -0.86 1.213 52.8% +12 -85 -241 66.9% +0.85 11–7 (61%) 38–13 (75%) — +3.89 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.24
24 2015 2048 167.3 +7.76 -2.58 1.147 52.1% +48 -7 -157 62.1% +0.81 12–4 (75%) 22–19 (54%) — +1.09 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.68
25 2016 2163 173.6 +8.50 +1.49 1.313 53.6% -7 -113 -8 69.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 27–14 (66%) — -1.03 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.82
26 2017 2079 162.7 +6.78 +0.23 1.261 53.2% +49 -42 +25 66.7% +0.92 4–1 (80%) 16–11 (59%) — -0.68 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.30
27 2018 1975 153.8 +8.35 -0.88 1.318 53.1% +7 +61 +177 64.0% +0.70 5–5 (50%) 18–11 (62%) — +1.79 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.52
28 2019 1934 154.2 +7.20 -0.04 1.360 53.8% +1 — +195 67.8% +0.93 3–6 (33%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.72 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99
29 2020 2017 164.6 +7.82 +0.28 1.382 54.3% +17 — — 72.2% +1.32 2–5 (29%) 13–8 (62%) — +0.12 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.04
30 2021 1979 139.0 +4.52 +0.69 1.309 53.5% +19 — — 62.1% +0.96 0–2 2–4 (33%) — +0.31 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) — +0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) — -1.56
32 2023 1919 127.9 +2.47 -1.58 0.944 49.3% +65 — +186 45.5% -0.23 1–0 3–4 (43%) — -0.07 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.36
33 2024 1898 124.3 +5.72 -1.03 1.214 51.5% +70 — +199 61.9% +0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.82 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.39
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04
Career — 2248 169.1 +7.54 -0.67 1.241 52.8% +29 -114 -17 64.8% +0.80 81–60 (57%) 232–150 (61%) 107.6 +1.81 — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.