H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Milos Raonic vs Yuichi Sugita H2H: 2-1
Milos Raonic holds a 2–1 lead over Yuichi Sugita in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yuichi Sugita won the 2017 Tokyo fourth round 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 37
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Yuichi Sugita | 1-0 (ret.) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Yuichi Sugita | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2011* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(1) | Yuichi Sugita | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Yuichi Sugita | #1,090 | #36 | 1,240 | 1,848 | 47 | 82 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Milos Raonic | Yuichi Sugita | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #235 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #112 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #145 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |