H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 1-2
Dusan Lajovic holds a 2–1 lead over Miomir Kecmanovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 2–0 on clay, while Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2025 Australian Open first round 7-5 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2025* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Miomir Kecmanovic | 7-5 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2023* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2023* | Banja Luka | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |