H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Jack Sock H2H: 2-0
Miomir Kecmanovic holds a 2–0 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miomir Kecmanovic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2022 Miami Masters first round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2022* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Miomir Kecmanovic | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2019* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Miomir Kecmanovic | 7-6(9) 7-6(5) | Jack Sock | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |