H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Miomir Kecmanovic vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 0-1

Jeremy Chardy holds a 1–0 lead over Miomir Kecmanovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2019 Moscow round of 16 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miomir Kecmanovic
Serbia Age 27 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #66 6-3 6-4 Miomir Kecmanovic #49 Match data Oct 18, 2019* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miomir Kecmanovic #64 #27 1,458 1,942 175 191 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2018 0–2 0.0% #131 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2019 22–20 52.4% #59 1,737 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2020 17–12 58.6% #44 1,811 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2021 14–25 35.9% #69 1,681 0 1 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2022 37–24 60.7% #29 1,880 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2023 24–30 44.4% #54 1,682 0 1 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2024 24–29 45.3% #54 1,769 0 1 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2025 23–27 46.0% #51 1,719 0 2 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2026 14–22 38.9% #64 1,660 0 2 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2020 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2021 8 15 23 34.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2023 13 17 30 43.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2024 14 19 33 42.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2025 19 18 37 51.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2026 10 13 23 43.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 113 120 233 48.5% 43 48 91 47.3% 19 23 42 45.2% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/366 of Miomir Kecmanovic's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2018 2/2 2.0 4.0 54.9% 68.6% 48.8% 61.8% 66.7% 59.6% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 42/42 3.7 2.3 61.7% 72.2% 55.9% 59.9% 36.4% 65.9% 35.8% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2020 29/29 5.1 2.7 56.8% 71.1% 52.0% 61.8% 45.0% 62.8% 38.1% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2021 37/39 4.1 2.4 61.3% 66.1% 52.4% 53.5% 38.6% 60.6% 36.8% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2022 61/61 3.7 1.5 62.8% 69.6% 54.7% 58.7% 42.9% 64.2% 38.9% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2023 54/54 4.3 1.9 60.8% 69.7% 54.3% 60.4% 41.5% 63.7% 37.1% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2024 53/53 4.6 2.1 61.8% 70.6% 53.0% 54.7% 38.0% 64.0% 35.5% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2025 46/50 5.2 2.6 61.7% 73.4% 49.8% 56.0% 42.4% 64.3% 36.6% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2026 36/36 4.9 2.6 62.1% 72.7% 53.9% 54.4% 37.9% 65.4% 35.5% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2017 1523 108.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 1523 109.1 -2.34 -0.04 0.761 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — -0.14 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 1738 136.0 +1.11 +0.25 1.049 50.7% -45 -109 -70 49.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.34 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2020 1811 152.0 +0.41 +0.92 1.024 50.6% -34 -102 — 50.0% +0.04 7–1 (88%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.24 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2021 1681 139.9 -2.18 -0.06 0.934 48.6% -2 +40 -20 43.4% -0.55 4–12 (25%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.07 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36
22 2022 1880 158.3 +1.28 +2.51 1.087 51.3% +3 -38 -181 57.9% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.44 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59
23 2023 1682 143.3 -0.28 +0.50 1.022 50.3% +34 +72 -37 47.7% -0.09 5–13 (28%) 15–18 (45%) — +1.58 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43
24 2024 1769 147.8 +0.06 -0.05 0.985 49.5% -45 +47 -48 45.9% -0.14 8–9 (47%) 8–19 (30%) — -1.66 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53
25 2025 1720 142.1 -0.36 +0.34 1.023 50.2% -3 +9 +6 48.6% -0.02 9–16 (36%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.94 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81
26 2026 1661 138.0 +0.52 +0.20 1.027 50.3% +25 +15 +26 46.6% -0.29 7–15 (32%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.14 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1942 149.6 +0.12 +0.65 1.020 50.2% -9 +8 -50 48.8% -0.05 54–76 (42%) 82–99 (45%) 92.2 -0.94 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.