H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 07:22 UTC

Miomir Kecmanovic vs Lukas Lacko

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Miomir Kecmanovic vs Lukas Lacko.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miomir Kecmanovic
Serbia Age 26 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
No head-to-head meetings found.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miomir Kecmanovic #66 #27 1,458 1,941 177 189 48.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 134 37.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2018 0–2 0.0% #131 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2019 22–20 52.4% #59 1,737 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2020 17–12 58.6% #44 1,810 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2021 14–25 35.9% #69 1,680 0 1 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2022 37–24 60.7% #29 1,879 0 1 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2023 24–30 44.4% #54 1,681 0 1 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2024 24–29 45.3% #54 1,768 0 1 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2025 26–28 48.1% #51 1,725 0 2 2013 11–15 42.3% #81 1,671 0 0
26 2026 13–19 40.6% #66 1,692 0 2 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,735 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,648 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,578 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,496 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2020 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2021 8 15 23 34.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2023 13 17 30 43.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2024 14 19 33 42.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2025 17 17 34 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2026 9 10 19 47.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 110 116 226 48.7% 48 50 98 49.0% 19 23 42 45.2% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 13 15 13.3% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/367 of Miomir Kecmanovic's and 214/215 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2018 2/2 2.0 4.0 54.9% 68.6% 48.8% 61.8% 66.7% 59.6% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 42/42 3.7 2.3 61.7% 72.2% 55.9% 59.9% 36.4% 65.9% 35.8% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2020 29/29 5.1 2.7 56.8% 71.1% 52.0% 61.8% 45.0% 62.8% 38.1% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2021 37/39 4.1 2.4 61.3% 66.1% 52.4% 53.5% 38.6% 60.6% 36.8% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2022 61/61 3.7 1.5 62.8% 69.6% 54.7% 58.7% 42.9% 64.2% 38.9% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2023 54/54 4.3 1.9 60.8% 69.7% 54.3% 60.4% 41.5% 63.7% 37.1% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2024 53/53 4.6 2.1 61.8% 70.6% 53.0% 54.7% 38.0% 64.0% 35.5% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2025 50/54 5.0 2.5 61.4% 73.2% 50.2% 56.3% 41.7% 64.2% 37.0% 2013 26/26 5.8 2.8 58.0% 69.0% 48.6% 53.7% 38.0% 60.2% 35.4%
26 2026 32/33 5.2 2.6 62.8% 73.9% 54.0% 55.5% 38.3% 66.4% 35.4% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
17 2017 1523 108.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 1522 109.1 -2.34 -0.04 0.761 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — -0.14 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 1738 135.9 +1.11 +0.25 1.049 50.7% -46 -110 -70 49.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 10–15 (40%) +0.50 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — +0.01
20 2020 1811 151.9 +0.41 +0.92 1.024 50.6% -35 -102 — 50.0% +0.04 7–1 (88%) 4–4 (50%) -1.38 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 +0.29
21 2021 1681 139.8 -2.18 -0.06 0.934 48.6% -2 +39 -20 43.4% -0.55 4–12 (25%) 10–8 (56%) -0.04 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) +0.07
22 2022 1880 158.3 +1.28 +2.51 1.087 51.3% +3 -38 -181 57.9% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 14–12 (54%) -1.35 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) -0.84
23 2023 1682 143.2 -0.28 +0.50 1.022 50.3% +34 +71 -37 47.7% -0.09 5–13 (28%) 15–18 (45%) +1.59 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) -0.72
24 2024 1769 147.7 +0.06 -0.05 0.985 49.5% -45 +47 -48 45.9% -0.14 8–9 (47%) 8–19 (30%) -1.54 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) -0.23
25 2025 1725 142.5 -0.36 +0.64 1.034 50.3% -17 +48 0 49.3% +0.06 11–16 (41%) 12–16 (43%) -1.21 2013 1671 140.6 -2.32 -1.21 0.891 48.1% +27 — — 47.0% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) -0.04
26 2026 1692 137.9 +1.26 +0.22 1.054 50.7% +30 +13 -7 47.8% -0.19 7–14 (33%) 9–8 (53%) +0.23 2014 1735 137.9 -0.41 -1.84 0.904 48.4% +2 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) -0.08
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1649 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -39 — +62 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) -0.16
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1683 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -126 — +131 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) +0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -15 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) +0.27
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1677 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -90 — +172 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) +1.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1513 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 +0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1942 149.7 +0.17 +0.70 1.023 50.3% -11 +14 -55 49.0% -0.03 56–75 (43%) 82–100 (45%) -0.92 — 1838 133.1 -0.91 -1.44 0.888 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.9% -0.69 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.