H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Miomir Kecmanovic vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 0-1

Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Miomir Kecmanovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2021 Belgrade 2 round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miomir Kecmanovic
Serbia Age 27 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #91 6-3 6-2 Miomir Kecmanovic #48 Match data May 27, 2021* R32 Belgrade 2 ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miomir Kecmanovic #64 #27 1,458 1,942 175 191 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2018 0–2 0.0% #131 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2019 22–20 52.4% #59 1,737 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2020 17–12 58.6% #44 1,811 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2021 14–25 35.9% #69 1,681 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2022 37–24 60.7% #29 1,880 0 1 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0
23 2023 24–30 44.4% #54 1,682 0 1 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0
24 2024 24–29 45.3% #54 1,769 0 1 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2025 23–27 46.0% #51 1,719 0 2 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2026 14–22 38.9% #64 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Pablo Cuevas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 8 15 23 34.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —
23 2023 13 17 30 43.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2024 14 19 33 42.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — —
25 2025 19 18 37 51.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — —
26 2026 10 13 23 43.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
Career — 113 120 233 48.5% 43 48 91 47.3% 19 23 42 45.2% — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/366 of Miomir Kecmanovic's and 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Pablo Cuevas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2018 2/2 2.0 4.0 54.9% 68.6% 48.8% 61.8% 66.7% 59.6% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 42/42 3.7 2.3 61.7% 72.2% 55.9% 59.9% 36.4% 65.9% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 29/29 5.1 2.7 56.8% 71.1% 52.0% 61.8% 45.0% 62.8% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 37/39 4.1 2.4 61.3% 66.1% 52.4% 53.5% 38.6% 60.6% 36.8% 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6%
22 2022 61/61 3.7 1.5 62.8% 69.6% 54.7% 58.7% 42.9% 64.2% 38.9% 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
23 2023 54/54 4.3 1.9 60.8% 69.7% 54.3% 60.4% 41.5% 63.7% 37.1% 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6%
24 2024 53/53 4.6 2.1 61.8% 70.6% 53.0% 54.7% 38.0% 64.0% 35.5% 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2%
25 2025 46/50 5.2 2.6 61.7% 73.4% 49.8% 56.0% 42.4% 64.3% 36.6% 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8%
26 2026 36/36 4.9 2.6 62.1% 72.7% 53.9% 54.4% 37.9% 65.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4%
Career — 360/366 4.4 2.2 61.3% 70.6% 53.3% 57.4% 40.5% 63.9% 36.8% — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Pablo Cuevas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2017 1523 108.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 1523 109.1 -2.34 -0.04 0.761 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 1738 136.0 +1.11 +0.25 1.049 50.7% -45 -109 -70 49.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2020 1811 152.0 +0.41 +0.92 1.024 50.6% -34 -102 — 50.0% +0.04 7–1 (88%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 1681 139.9 -2.18 -0.06 0.934 48.6% -2 +40 -20 43.4% -0.55 4–12 (25%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.07 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20
22 2022 1880 158.3 +1.28 +2.51 1.087 51.3% +3 -38 -181 57.9% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.44 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.48
23 2023 1682 143.3 -0.28 +0.50 1.022 50.3% +34 +72 -37 47.7% -0.09 5–13 (28%) 15–18 (45%) — +1.58 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +1.03
24 2024 1769 147.8 +0.06 -0.05 0.985 49.5% -45 +47 -48 45.9% -0.14 8–9 (47%) 8–19 (30%) — -1.66 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) — +0.76
25 2025 1720 142.1 -0.36 +0.34 1.023 50.2% -3 +9 +6 48.6% -0.02 9–16 (36%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.94 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.08
26 2026 1661 138.0 +0.55 +0.18 1.027 50.3% +26 +15 +27 46.6% -0.29 7–15 (32%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.40
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) — +2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.79
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.81
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.69
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.71
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.50
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1942 149.6 +0.12 +0.65 1.020 50.2% -9 +8 -50 48.8% -0.05 54–76 (42%) 82–99 (45%) 92.2 -0.94 — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.