H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mischa Zverev vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Mischa Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2006 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2006* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-1 6-3 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mischa Zverev | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |