H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mischa Zverev vs Michael Llodra H2H: 0-3
Michael Llodra holds a 3–0 lead over Mischa Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Llodra leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2010 Marseille semifinal 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2010* | Marseille | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Michael Llodra | 6-1 7-6(3) | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2009* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2009* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Michael Llodra | 4-1 (ret.) | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mischa Zverev | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |