H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mischa Zverev vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 1-1
Mischa Zverev and Robby Ginepri are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2008 New Haven fourth round 1-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2013 | Houston | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Robby Ginepri | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2008* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mischa Zverev | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-4 7-5 6-1 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mischa Zverev | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |