H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mischa Zverev vs Steve Johnson H2H: 2-0
Mischa Zverev holds a 2–0 lead over Steve Johnson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2018 Eastbourne fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2018* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Mischa Zverev | 6-3 6-3 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| May 26, 2017* | Geneva | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Mischa Zverev | 6-4 7-5 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mischa Zverev | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |