H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mitchell Krueger vs Denis Kudla H2H: 0-1

Denis Kudla holds a 1–0 lead over Mitchell Krueger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denis Kudla leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Denis Kudla won the 2017 Newport round of 32 6-4 5-7 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mitchell Krueger
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Denis Kudla
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denis Kudla #122 6-3 7-5 Mitchell Krueger #220 Match data Apr 9, 2018 Q2 Q U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay
Denis Kudla #178 6-4 5-7 6-0 Mitchell Krueger #186 Match data Jul 20, 2017* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mitchell Krueger #358 #135 462 1,688 11 25 30.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denis Kudla #1,269 #53 858 1,834 71 132 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mitchell Krueger Denis Kudla
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #496 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 2–2 50.0% #276 1,558 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 2–6 25.0% #137 1,574 0 0
20 2014 0–1 0.0% #362 1,470 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #114 1,628 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2014 3–5 37.5% #121 1,702 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2015 8–14 36.4% #69 1,759 0 0
23 2017 1–3 25.0% #191 1,515 0 0 2016 8–20 28.6% #131 1,637 0 0
24 2018 1–3 25.0% #228 1,573 0 0 2017 1–1 50.0% #174 1,593 0 0
25 2019 0–1 0.0% #167 1,569 0 0 2018 11–14 44.0% #63 1,789 0 0
26 2020 1–1 50.0% #192 1,558 0 0 2019 11–22 33.3% #113 1,714 0 0
27 2021 0–2 0.0% #169 1,525 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #114 1,663 0 0
28 2022 4–6 40.0% #214 1,639 0 0 2021 9–11 45.0% #105 1,702 0 0
29 2023 1–1 50.0% #283 1,604 0 0 2022 6–16 27.3% #106 1,571 0 0
30 2024 2–4 33.3% #147 1,635 0 0 2023 3–5 37.5% #163 1,535 0 0
31 2025 1–3 25.0% #206 1,521 0 0 2024 1–3 25.0% #267 1,553 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mitchell Krueger Denis Kudla
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 5 12 17 29.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2022 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2021 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2024 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2024 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 9 19 28 32.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — 39 88 127 30.7% 6 18 24 25.0% 26 26 52 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 36/36 of Mitchell Krueger's and 201/203 of Denis Kudla's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mitchell Krueger Denis Kudla
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 5.5 3.5 51.7% 63.9% 52.5% 59.6% 41.8% 58.3% 39.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 5.0 4.5 49.8% 64.8% 53.5% 58.4% 57.3% 59.1% 36.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 8/8 5.0 4.0 55.0% 65.0% 49.5% 56.0% 47.8% 58.2% 33.9%
20 2014 1/1 0.0 2.0 53.7% 51.7% 64.0% 0.0% 50.0% 57.4% 30.5% 2013 16/16 3.6 2.9 59.8% 71.6% 51.7% 62.9% 32.2% 63.5% 33.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 8/8 3.4 2.5 61.4% 64.2% 51.5% 72.0% 41.7% 59.5% 37.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 21/22 6.1 3.8 61.1% 68.1% 52.0% 50.3% 46.5% 61.7% 34.0%
23 2017 4/4 6.5 3.8 58.7% 66.8% 49.4% 61.2% 32.5% 59.5% 39.1% 2016 27/28 5.8 3.0 59.0% 70.6% 47.7% 51.7% 45.8% 60.9% 34.5%
24 2018 4/4 4.3 2.0 56.7% 68.1% 46.6% 44.3% 21.5% 58.8% 34.5% 2017 2/2 3.5 3.5 64.3% 70.5% 53.8% 47.5% 48.1% 64.5% 40.9%
25 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 69.2% 56.8% 36.1% 70.0% 50.0% 50.4% 21.5% 2018 25/25 8.4 4.0 56.4% 75.4% 50.5% 51.5% 40.2% 64.5% 33.8%
26 2020 2/2 8.5 2.5 61.0% 63.6% 45.1% 49.4% 54.5% 56.3% 28.1% 2019 33/33 6.1 3.6 57.0% 67.2% 48.3% 51.3% 39.6% 59.2% 33.6%
27 2021 2/2 2.5 3.0 61.2% 62.8% 42.5% 41.7% 0.0% 55.2% 24.1% 2020 1/1 19.0 7.0 61.9% 74.0% 51.6% 58.3% 75.0% 65.5% 30.7%
28 2022 10/10 3.5 1.7 66.2% 71.9% 53.6% 64.4% 44.7% 66.3% 34.9% 2021 20/20 6.5 4.0 55.8% 71.7% 51.1% 49.7% 35.6% 62.6% 33.4%
29 2023 2/2 3.5 1.5 62.6% 70.5% 56.4% 84.6% 58.3% 65.3% 39.2% 2022 22/22 4.9 2.5 62.1% 68.0% 49.6% 54.3% 44.2% 61.1% 32.8%
30 2024 6/6 8.3 3.7 62.2% 72.0% 53.4% 52.9% 39.4% 64.5% 37.2% 2023 8/8 4.3 2.6 61.1% 68.2% 52.6% 49.1% 49.2% 62.0% 30.9%
31 2025 4/4 3.8 2.8 64.8% 66.5% 52.3% 54.5% 41.5% 60.8% 37.3% 2024 4/4 4.8 2.5 54.3% 65.9% 42.6% 45.8% 25.7% 55.1% 35.7%
Career — 36/36 4.8 2.5 62.5% 68.3% 51.0% 56.2% 38.6% 61.9% 34.7% — 201/203 5.8 3.4 58.4% 69.4% 50.0% 53.4% 41.9% 61.3% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mitchell Krueger Denis Kudla
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1488 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1501 96.9 -2.83 -2.17 0.943 49.3% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.38
18 2012 1503 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1559 106.8 -2.45 -0.04 0.882 49.1% — — +89 50.0% -0.20 1–1 2–0 — +0.28
19 2013 1491 99.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1575 117.0 -1.45 -0.61 0.812 46.4% +24 — — 33.3% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.04
20 2014 1471 95.6 -1.43 -2.01 0.716 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.13 2013 1629 124.1 -1.05 -1.44 0.913 48.6% -38 — +119 34.9% -0.42 1–2 (33%) 0–5 (0%) — +1.13
21 2015 1462 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1703 119.7 -2.21 +1.02 0.937 48.9% -49 — +117 36.4% -0.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.25
22 2016 1456 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1759 142.0 -2.26 -1.39 0.887 48.2% -24 — +121 40.3% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.36
23 2017 1516 118.1 -0.94 +0.31 0.966 49.6% +80 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.07 2016 1637 127.5 -2.48 -0.93 0.882 47.5% +20 -22 +109 30.0% -1.09 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.48
24 2018 1573 115.9 -0.95 -1.63 0.836 45.7% +37 — — 27.3% -1.64 1–0 0–1 — -0.03 2017 1593 110.5 -3.46 +3.63 1.150 51.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 — — +0.35
25 2019 1570 115.8 +4.44 +4.88 0.434 40.1% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.27 2018 1790 136.9 +0.60 -0.85 0.952 49.2% -49 -94 0 45.3% -0.31 2–3 (40%) 5–8 (38%) — -1.08
26 2020 1559 106.3 -1.18 -1.39 0.643 43.6% — — — 42.9% -1.00 — — — +0.25 2019 1715 129.0 -3.76 -1.81 0.825 46.4% -3 -110 +45 36.4% -0.97 5–4 (56%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.65
27 2021 1525 103.1 -1.47 -2.95 0.538 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.12 2020 1663 114.4 -0.49 +1.01 0.888 49.1% — — — 40.0% -0.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.17
28 2022 1639 118.3 -1.03 +0.73 1.036 50.6% -6 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.12 2021 1703 130.5 -0.68 -1.57 0.893 48.0% -32 — +158 42.9% -0.43 6–3 (67%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.54
29 2023 1605 116.6 -0.78 +0.28 1.130 52.8% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.23 2022 1571 126.0 -2.43 -1.28 0.845 47.4% +31 — +202 34.4% -0.87 4–6 (40%) 3–12 (20%) — +0.23
30 2024 1635 117.0 -0.76 -0.74 1.048 50.7% +17 — — 44.4% +0.06 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.32 2023 1536 113.1 -1.49 -0.41 0.815 46.2% +20 — — 36.4% -1.27 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.05
31 2025 1521 103.3 -1.31 -1.81 0.949 48.0% +29 — — 36.4% -0.64 — 0–1 — -0.16 2024 1554 115.2 -2.14 -1.75 0.794 45.3% +28 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–1 — +0.26
32 2026 1474 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1688 117.4 -0.88 -0.41 0.911 48.3% +25 — — 35.2% -0.84 2–8 (20%) 3–8 (27%) 92.4 +0.22 — 1835 131.9 -1.89 -1.10 0.878 47.8% -7 -74 +95 37.7% -0.71 34–34 (50%) 38–54 (41%) 97.1 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.