H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nick Kyrgios vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 1-1
Nick Kyrgios and Mischa Zverev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2017 Beijing fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2016* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mischa Zverev | 6-3 6-1 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nick Kyrgios | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |