H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nick Kyrgios vs Tim Smyczek H2H: 1-1
Nick Kyrgios and Tim Smyczek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2016 Miami Masters third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2016* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 6-4 6-4 | Tim Smyczek | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2014* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Smyczek | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Tim Smyczek | #862 | #68 | 688 | 1,768 | 43 | 85 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nick Kyrgios | Tim Smyczek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #89 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #140 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #355 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |