H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Albert Montanes H2H: 3-3

Nicolas Almagro and Albert Montanes are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2016 Buenos Aires third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 2016* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #72 6-3 6-3 Albert Montanes #125 Match data
Aug 16, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #11 7-6(5) 6-4 Albert Montanes #45 Match data
Mar 15, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Albert Montanes #26 4-6 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Apr 14, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Albert Montanes #36 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) Nicolas Almagro #20 Match data
Mar 4, 2006* Acapulco ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #100 6-4 6-0 Albert Montanes #96 Match data
Apr 29, 2004* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Albert Montanes #82 3-6 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #142 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6