H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 5-1

Nicolas Almagro holds a 5–1 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 3–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2017 Australian Open first round 4-0 RET.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jeremy Chardy #72 4-0 (ret.) Nicolas Almagro #42 Match data
Feb 15, 2014* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #18 7-6(7) 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #45 Match data
Oct 10, 2013* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #16 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #38 Match data
Jul 31, 2010* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #18 6-2 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #69 Match data
Mar 29, 2010* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #38 6-2 6-7(9) 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #48 Match data
Jun 3, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #20 7-6(0) 7-6(7) 7-5 Jeremy Chardy #145 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1