H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 2-3

Jurgen Melzer holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2015 Kitzbuhel fourth round 7-6(4) 7-5.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 2015* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #137 7-6(4) 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #130 Match data
Apr 17, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #36 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Apr 15, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Jurgen Melzer #9 6-1 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Oct 30, 2010* Vienna ATP 500 SF Hard Jurgen Melzer #12 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #16 Match data
May 15, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #35 6-3 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5