H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nicolas Almagro vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Almagro holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2013 Valencia fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 7-5 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Almagro | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |