H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-4

Pablo Cuevas holds a 4–1 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pablo Cuevas leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2016 US Open second round 7-6(5) 6-4 7-6(9).

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #48 7-6(5) 6-4 7-6(9) Pablo Cuevas #20 Match data
Feb 19, 2015* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R32 Clay Pablo Cuevas #23 4-6 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #91 Match data
Feb 14, 2015* Sao Paulo ATP 250 QF Clay Pablo Cuevas #32 7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #82 Match data
Jan 14, 2015* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Pablo Cuevas #29 7-6(5) 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #67 Match data
Jul 25, 2009* Hamburg ATP 500 QF Clay Pablo Cuevas #107 6-2 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 211 212 49.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,631 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,744 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,718 0 0
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,842 0 2
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2016 33–22 60.0% #22 1,818 0 5
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,788 0 6
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,740 0 6
34 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6