H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Coutelot vs Jacobo Diaz H2H: 1-0

Nicolas Coutelot holds a 1–0 lead over Jacobo Diaz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Coutelot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Coutelot won the 2000 Casablanca round of 32 2-4 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Coutelot
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jacobo Diaz
ESP Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jacobo Diaz #130 5-7 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Coutelot #228 Match data May 29, 2000 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Nicolas Coutelot #256 2-4 (ret.) Jacobo Diaz #102 Match data Apr 13, 2000* R32 Casablanca ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Coutelot #1,478 #87 451 1,629 13 19 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jacobo Diaz #833 #68 622 1,628 28 62 31.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Coutelot Jacobo Diaz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #419 1,489 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 2–4 33.3% #161 1,507 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 6–8 42.9% #119 1,557 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 7–9 43.8% #145 1,576 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 2–7 22.2% #92 1,503 0 0
23 2000 1–2 33.3% #152 1,471 0 0 2000 1–11 8.3% #111 1,463 0 0
24 2001 2–2 50.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2001 9–14 39.1% #88 1,531 0 0
25 2002 8–13 38.1% #130 1,533 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #396 1,509 0 0
26 2003 2–2 50.0% #192 1,615 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #627 1,458 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Coutelot Jacobo Diaz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 2 2 0.0% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — 3 18 21 14.3% 25 42 67 37.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 27/32 of Nicolas Coutelot's and 2/2 of Jacobo Diaz's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Coutelot Jacobo Diaz
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2000 2/3 6.5 3.5 58.7% 69.2% 37.0% 35.7% 66.7% 55.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 3/4 2.7 3.3 64.5% 70.5% 56.7% 73.4% 37.0% 65.1% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 18/21 2.3 3.3 62.6% 65.9% 47.1% 57.4% 42.2% 58.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 4/4 7.5 5.3 53.1% 72.2% 48.6% 60.6% 46.9% 61.8% 36.6% 2003 2/2 4.5 6.0 57.9% 66.4% 49.0% 43.8% 50.0% 59.0% 28.4%
Career — 27/32 3.4 3.6 61.1% 67.6% 47.6% 58.1% 44.2% 59.4% 36.2% — 2/90 4.5 6.0 57.9% 66.4% 49.0% 43.8% 50.0% 59.0% 28.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Coutelot Jacobo Diaz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1490 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.01
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1508 120.1 — — — — — +24 — 47.1% -0.53 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.43
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1558 121.4 — — — — — +33 — 45.5% -0.36 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -0.11
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1576 124.5 — — — — — +62 — 44.4% -0.31 1–1 0–2 — +0.33
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1504 111.7 — — — — — +95 — 34.8% -0.96 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.70
23 2000 1472 103.8 -1.49 -0.04 0.804 45.4% — +37 — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.01 2000 1463 116.2 — — — — -4 +75 — 24.1% -1.59 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.41
24 2001 1476 102.4 +0.15 +1.50 1.023 50.6% — +70 — 61.5% +0.69 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.07 2001 1531 120.5 — — — — -95 +104 — 41.0% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.96
25 2002 1534 124.9 -2.36 -1.40 0.872 47.8% — +69 — 38.9% -0.85 4–3 (57%) 1–5 (17%) — 0.00 2002 1509 118.2 — — — — -99 +126 — 25.0% -1.06 1–1 0–2 — -0.43
26 2003 1616 120.9 +1.61 +0.18 0.959 49.8% — +58 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–1 — -0.11 2003 1459 95.6 -1.09 -1.94 0.692 44.6% — — — 16.7% -1.84 0–1 — — +0.36
27 2004 1575 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1578 105.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1630 118.9 -1.43 -0.74 0.893 48.3% — +64 — 43.0% -0.56 5–6 (45%) 3–9 (25%) 96.4 -0.09 — 1629 125.9 -1.09 -1.94 0.692 44.6% -69 +69 — 37.7% -0.83 6–21 (22%) 9–13 (41%) 91.5 +1.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.